Panopticism is
a theory of social control outlined by Michel Foucault in his book, Discipline
and Punish, and is based around an idea of surveillance developed during a
period when institutions such as asylums, penitentiaries and reformatories were
in their earliest forms. It relies entirely on the reformation of individuals
captive through controlling them mentally.
The Panopticon
(Jeremy Bentham, 1791) became ‘the architectural figure of this compostition’.
Foucault states that ‘it reverses the principle of the dungeon’, preserving
only its primary function of enclosure. Inmates are kept in cells individually,
which surround a central tower that is not lit. Each cell is lit from the
outside wall, meaning that the inmates can always be seen from the central
tower, but cannot see into the tower themselves. The major effect this has is
‘to induce in the inmate a state of conscious and permanent visibility that
assures the automatic functioning of power’.
There are many
elements of contemporary society that could be seen as remaining elements of
this panoptic form of social control, one of the major examples being CCTV
cameras. It is thought that people are filmed more than 300 times a day by
these cameras and we are constantly reminded of this fact through the media.
They are always present where ever you are so it is evident that one could
always see you. However like the central tower in the panopticon it is unclear
as to whether you’re actually being watched by anyone at the other end of the
camera; ’power should be visible yet unverifiable’.
This means that people act in the way that they believe they should
act if they are being watched, whether they are or not. CCTV cameras also have
the effect of deterrence in their positioning, and the signs that are used to
warn people of their presence, as soon as someone is made aware that they could
be under surveillance they will act as they believe they should, becoming, as
Foucault described, a ‘docile body’. This also means, that often the cameras
don’t have to work, as it is impossible to tell whether they are or not, and it
is the possibility that you could be being watched that makes you behave in
such a way. The sign warning you of the camera and the actual presentation of
the camera therefore becomes more important than itself due to the effect of ‘self-regulation’
that this instills upon the person.
No comments:
Post a Comment